Opinion: Government’s anti-terrorism bill goes too far

Before Bill C-51 goes any further, an independent review body needs to examine exactly what this Bill means and the extent of its reach.

Do we need Bill C-51, the Anti-Terrorism Act?

Imagine this. A group of young people, all different ethnic backgrounds, are sitting around the water cooler indulging in a friendly heated debate about, well, anything. It could be about a video game, a new music CD, girls, a by-law, a movie, or parent’s rules. In their enthusiasm, some lapse into their own language and the others laugh or toss out some derisive statement about a politician or someone in authority. Suddenly they find themselves confronted by an official who has decided to arrest and detain them while he investigates their comments further. He’s acting on some hazy sense that an arrest may likely prevent a terrorist attack because of something he thought someone said.

Really? What happened to innocent conversation, privacy and freedom of speech?

The abstract scenario might be a little excessive but it’s that kind of cause and effect that concerns a lot of people over the proposed tightened security laws contained in Bill C-51. It has launched questions and some profound problems.

The Bill had first reading in Parliament on January 30 and it’s created a furor ever since. This Bill gives government agencies carte blanche access to big data information-sharing that will pull all Canadians, by accident or design, into a bureaucratic web. In the quest to analyze massive amounts of personal data to profile trends, habits and behaviours, and in the process isolate those who stand apart from the “norm”, the level of collection will know no bounds. Information will be kept forever. No one will be able to know or find out how much of their personal information has been collected and shared.

That’s pushing the envelope.

The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives says the Bill would expand the powers of CSIS so that they could arrest Canadians on a suspicion that they might be involved in something criminal in the future.

Then there’s the Passenger Protect Program, aka the no-fly list, which identifies individuals who may pose a threat to aviation security The program prevents them from boarding an aircraft. So what if your name gets added in error (and it has happened in the past) and there is no mechanism to have that corrected?

But it’s the invasion of privacy, a right protected under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, that worries many people. Who is squaring the circle between the right to privacy and the need for security? Section 8 of the Charter provides everyone in Canada with protection against unreasonable search and protects our privacy rights against unreasonable intrusion, including surveillance, from the state. To what level does Bill C-51 conflict with that?

After the Parliament shooting last October, 70 per cent of Canadians supported stiffer terrorism legislation according to a poll conducted by Forum Research. Today that number is down to 50 per cent.

The Bill launches us on a slippery slope, especially considering legitimate groups such as environmental organizations could be targeted for surveillance and the fact that there is no parliamentary oversight to monitor the activities of security services. That is setting the bar too low.

Before Bill C-51 goes any further, an independent review body needs to fully examine exactly what this Bill means and the full extent of its reach. We need to know whether and to what degree it is unconstitutional, the extent to which it erodes privacy and the degree to which government agencies can set their power limit. It’s not too much of a stretch to imagine how that could be abused. So who is minding the minders?

This piece of legislation is a bit too Orwellian. In its current state, we don’t need Bill C-51.

Just Posted

Heather’s Hope Chest offers Chilliwack women and girls a helping hand

The new ‘free store’ for vulnerable women and girls provides them with household items at no charge

Rainbow crosswalk count will rise to 16 in Chilliwack

So far 11 rainbows are painted and five planned, all since council denied the first proposal in September

Brother of Chilliwack homicide victim killed in Surrey on Remembrance Day

Andrew Baldwin shot on Nov. 11, three weeks after Keith Baldwin shot in downtown Chilliwack

Volunteer organization provides first aid and rescue services

Main fundraiser, the Winter Extreme Ski and Board Swap, takes place at Abbotsford Exhibition Park Nov. 16 and 17

WATCH: Paralyzed ex motocross champion is returning to Chilliwack for book launch

Brent Worrall says he is living proof that no one should ever give up hope

VIDEO: B.C. to restrict nicotine content, bring in 20% tax on vaping products

Province will also restrict candy and fruit flavoured vaping products to adult-only stores

Seguin lifts surging Stars to 4-2 win over Canucks

Dallas is 6-0-1 in last seven outings

B.C. government working with RCMP to address $10 million in budget cuts

Public Safety Minister Mike Farnworth issues statement following report of RCMP cost-cutting

UPDATE: Metro Vancouver bus drivers to refuse overtime as transit strike escalates

Overtime ban could disrupt 10-15 per cent of bus service in Metro Vancouver

‘City that protects rapists’: Sexual assault survivor slams Kelowna mayor for defending RCMP

Heather Friesen spent the morning handing out flyers around city hall calling out the mayor

South Surrey man and city settle beef over backyard cow

Asad Syed, who kept a calf on his property last year, met City of Surrey in court Tuesday

Batten down the hatches: Wet and windy weekend on the way for coastal B.C.

Environment Canada issues special weather warning for Lower Mainland, Vancouver Island

BC Liquor Stores to move fully to paper bags by March

Vancouver Island to be the first to convert to paper bags in November

Tolko shuts B.C. divisions for two weeks over holidays

Head office to close from Dec. 23-27; two weeks’ downtime runs Dec. 21-Jan. 6

Most Read